Tuesday, December 27, 2011

New Car

We bought a brand new 2012 Nissan Rogue S Special Edition. We bought it from Don Davis Nissan in Arlington, TX. Our salesman, James Whitehouse, was GREAT to work with. He knew what he was doing and didn't try to play games. Overall we had a great experience and I would recommend them to anyone.

US Bank, however, is a TERRIBLE company to work with. US Bank held the lease for the Toyota Camry we traded in. We tried calling them to get a trade-in payoff amount, but they would not give us that info. Only a dealership could get that info. And US Bank would only allow a trade-in if we proved that we were buying a car fe that dealership. So we could not have traded in the Camry at CarMax and then bought a car at Don Davis. That scenario is not likely, but it should be an option. The first CSR we talked to at US Bank was rude and gave us wrong information. Luckily the second time we called we got a nice CSR that seemed to know what she was doing. All-in-all, I would NOT recommend leasing through US Bank. I will probably never do a lease again. I don't necessarily think leasing in general is bad, but I don't think it is appropriate for me.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Public Service Announcement (PSA) Reflections

The last assignment for EDLD 5363 Multimedia Video Tech was to work with a group and create a PSA.  The group comprised 5 people all in different parts of the state/country.  We had two weeks to create the PSA and were given some very simple guidelines.  The video needed to be 60 seconds and everybody had to participate in some way.

Our group started off a little rough, mainly because we didn't know each other and we are all working on different timelines.  I am a bit of a procrastinator, but one of our group members was leaving out of the country before the end of the class.  So he was pushing to get it done.  This motivated me and the other members to get in gear and create something.

We started slow on the ideas, but the Prof suggested AGAINST "Cyber-Bullying" so we went with "Texting."  I'm also a bit of a jokester and I figured if we had to make a PSA we should have some fun with it.  So we took the serious topic of excessive texting and went of the deep-end with it.  I think the result is hilarious.

My group pulled it together and got everything done.  It was a little scattered at times, but it worked.  In the future I think it would be beneficial to:
1) Know your group members before hand, or try to build in some "get-to-know-you" activities if the groups are randomly assigned
2) Set a timeline of events and meetings.  Try to coordinate with everyone's schedules
3) Web conference with people to be able to see their faces.  I was able to do this with one of the team members and it made it much easier to relate to him.

A special thanks goes out to Shawn P.  His video editing skills are what really put this assignment over the top.

Finished video

Web Conference - EDLD 5363 Wk5

These are the highlights of this weeks discussion (12/15/2011 8pm)
No final Exam Reflection Paper

Next Class is in January (Jan 12,15, or 18, there are conflicting reports)

Show Proof of collaboration

Everyone gets 100s for discussion board.

Everything we do goes in our e-portfolio (google site)

Everything we submit for this assignment needs to be submitted to TK20

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Web Conference - EDLD 5363 Wk3

Brief Overview of the web conference:
Week 4 and 5 are ONE assignment, so I do not have to submit anything this week.
There was an error in the grading system for the Wk2 assignment, so we will all be getting a 100% :-)
Dr. A repeated several times that we should film a bunch of extra footage for our PSA, so that we have plenty of material to cut and "leave on the editing floor"  The opposite scenario would be terrible.

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Web Conference - EDLD 5363 Wk2

I attempted to participate in the web conference on Monday (11/21), but Dr. A was not able to get the web conference software to work.  Due to it being Thanksgiving break, I had family obligations for the week and was unable to attend the other conferences.  I did however have a chance to meet with a classmate that gave me an overview of what was said.
The important parts for me were that our wiki/google-site IS the eportfolio mentioned in the assignment.  There was also discussion about the PSA we will be working on in the next few weeks.
I also learned that we have a few other people added to our group for the PSA project, a husband and wife and another gentleman.  I look forward to working with them.  I have developed a great core group of classmates that I can bounce ideas off of, get clarification from, and just chat with.  This class has been rather confusing and without my classmates I would be lost.

Review of jaycut.com

This week for my Grad Class I was to find and review some video editing software.  I have assigned my students to use jaycut.com, but have not used it myself.  I took this opportunity to learn the website for myself.  You can listen to my podcast review and see the video I edited here:
https://sites.google.com/site/mrwaitsclass/lamar/video-editing-software-review---jaycut-com

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Sunday, October 23, 2011

Family day at the Pumpkin Patch





Action Research Plan Draft

SIP or PIP (SCHOOL or PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT) PLAN OF ACTION


SCHOOL VISION: We engage learners to become critical thinkers, leaders and contributors in a diverse and competitive world.


GOAL:  Improve technology integration in the classroom, by improving the technology comfort and skill level of the teachers.




OUTCOMES

ACTIVITIES

RESOURCES/ RESEARCH TOOLS NEEDED

RESPONSIBILITY TO ADDRESS ACTIVITIES

TIME LINE

Benchmarks/
ASSESSMENT

Revisions to SIP/PIP based on monitoring and
assessments

Determine current level of technology use and
comfort/skill level of teachers

Survey the teaching staff on campus

Review STAR Charts for campus

Personal online survey site/google
form

STAR Charts




B. Waits

Oct. 2011



TBD 2011?




Campus STAR Charts



Determine current limiting factors to technology
integration

Analyze survey

Personally interview teachers

Research topic online

Survey/STAR Chart Results

Teachers willing to be interviewed

Google



B. Waits


Nov. 2011






Improve technology skills of teachers

Lead “Tech Thurs” Staff Dev. Sessions, based off of
results of surveys

Create/find videos to address the results of the
survey

Assist teachers in integrating technology into a
sample/specific lesson

Campus approval needed.




Online resources TBD




TBD


B. Waits
Campus ITS


Ongoing
Nov. 2011 – Dec. 2012


Determine participant use of offerings.


Adjust format and topics offered based on feedback
from participants.

Determine new level of technology use and
comfort/skill level of teachers

Follow-Up Survey for the teaching staff on campus

Review new STAR Charts for campus

Personal online survey site/google
form

STAR Charts




B. Waits

Dec 2012



TBD 2012?




Campus STAR Charts





Sunday, October 9, 2011

Blogging and Educational Leaders

Blogging is a great place to store and share your thoughts. As one of my textbooks said, it's like Prof. Dumbledore's "pensieve" in the Harry Potter books. For the educational leader, this is a good place to organize and store your thoughts. The key though is to occasional go back through and revisit those thoughts. They may give you insight to a current problem or allow you to link several different strands together to come up with a new solution.

For action research purposes, blogging is a great way to keep stakeholders informed of the status of your research. And it gives them space to contribute an new information or insights.

Action Research / Inquiry

I have just started my second Grad class; EDLD 5301 Research for Teachers. This class is over the topic of Action Research. At first glance, the word Research made my stomach turn. This was illustrated in one of our textbooks (Dana, 2009):
The images that the word research conjures up come mostly from the
process-product paradigm and include a “controlled setting,” “an
experiment with control and treatment groups,” “an objective scientist
removed from the subjects of study so as not to contaminate findings,”
“long hours in the library,” and “crunching numbers.”

The author then goes on to describe why the word inquiry is preferred. The process of action research/inquiry is introspective. The practitioner analyzes what is working for him and what is not. Then he develops a plan to address his needs. After implementing his plan, the practitioner, again, analyzes what is working and what is not and repeats this cyclical process. Action research is therefore a living process and allows for a practitioner to continually improve and grow. The concept can be applied at all levels and can benefit all participants. The process was illustrated, in one of the other textbooks, through the example of a doctor and patient. The a patient is having a problem, they set an appointment with their doctor. The doctor sees the patient and listens to them describe the symptoms. He then determines what tests and lab work should be done to pinpoint the root problem. Once the doctor has determined the problem, he prescribes a treatment plan. The patient goes home and follows the treatment plan and then returns to the doctor to be re-evaluated. If the problem is gone, the treatment plan was a success. If the problem still exists, or a new problem has arisen, the doctor starts the process over to modify or create a new treatment plan. This same type of process can be used to analyze and correct problems in education.

In my school, there are several possibilities to utilize action research. I would like help improve the technology skills of my fellow teachers. I first need to analyze what is holding them back and develop a plan to assist them. I would also like to help my students improve their "number sense" skills. As a school, we need more parent involvement. We could utilize action research to design and implement a plan to increase parent involvement.





References:
Dana, N.F. (2009). Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action Researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Course Reflections - EDLD 5306

It has been seven years since I graduated from Texas Tech with my BBA and what a journey it has been. I have been contemplating a Graduate Degree for several years now, but most of the degrees offered were in School Administration. I really have no desire to become a Vice Principal or Principal. I left the business world, because I did not like politics, and I do not want to move into school politics. When I saw the Educational Technology Leadership degree from Lamar Univ., I got very excited. This was the first degree I had seen that focused on technology. The first course was Intro to Ed Tech. I was nervous about going back to "school" and all the things that come with it like the books and tuition, the research papers and everything else. I was excited though and I thought this will be great. The class should teach me about using technology in the classroom and how to lead other people in using technology. The class was slightly different than I thought. I did learn some new technologies and have already started incorporating them into my class. But the class discussed much more than specific technologies. The topics ranged from national technology standards to budgets to performance indicators and an internship. Come to find out, this degree is an administration degree with an emphasis on technology. It's not exactly what I had in mind, but I think it will work. At the end of the class, I will be able to test for my administration certificate. Again, I have no plans to become a school administrator, but I do think this will open doors for jobs of technology facilitator or leader at the District level. The pace of the course is very fast, and my head is still spinning. They have crammed a semesters worth of material into five weeks. I will definitely have to get used to work quickly and efficiently on my assignments, so that I do not get behind.

There have been several assignments in this course that have been useful and some that will eventually be useful. At first, I did not enjoy creating a Wordle (www.wordle.net) or an Animoto (www.animoto.com). I felt these activities were basically used in ELA classes and they were a waste of time for me since I teach Math. However, I have already incorporated a Wordle into a vocabulary activity for my math improvement class. I haven't touched Animoto again, but it will be in the back of my mind for later use. There were also the research assignments on the national technology standards and other budgetary things. In my current position as a math teacher, these topics don't help me that much. But, I eventually want to transition to a higher level job in the district and these topics should be very useful then and show that I am a knowledgeable and qualified candidate. I also found it very interesting in the technology standards that are written for administration. We have several administrators that are very knowledgeable in these, and we have some "old school" administrators that have some work to do.

One of the assignments in this course was to write a brief two-page paper on a given topic. I chose to write about cyber ethics, but the paper did not really ever get written. I basically ran out of time. With the class only being five weeks long, we have a new assignment every week. And these are multiple part assignments. Some weeks were a little easier than others. But this paper came at the end of a longer assignment and it just didn't happen. I analyzed the rubric for the assignment and figured that this paper wasn't as important as the other parts of the assignment and it got pushed to a back burner. This is completely my fault and caused by my lack of time management skills. This is definitely something I will have to work on in my next class. I do think cyber ethics are an important part of the technology learning process, but I dropped the ball on completing this paper.

However, I would say I was successful at carrying out 90% of the course assignments. I have an A in the class so far, and I feel I have done a decent job. It was a very steep learning curve and I am writing this last part of the Week 5 assignment at 8:45pm on Sunday. This class officially ends at 11:59pm this evening. And this is how most of my assignments have gone. It has been very hard juggling a full time teaching job, with a wife and a 14-month-old daughter. So far it has been work all week, have family time on Saturday and cram the assignments in on Sunday, then rinse and repeat. I am still trying to figure out how to juggle all these things and still be successful. I will definitely need to start working on the assignments during the week so that it is not all crammed into the weekend. What scares me now are all the Internship Requirements. When am I going to have time to go to School Board meetings and everything else? Luckily I have a very loving and supportive wife and an extended family that will step in and help whenever we need it.

The lack of time management skills aside, I have learned much about the technology landscape and myself. I have learned that I really do know a lot about technology and that I should be a great resource in helping others incorporate technology into their classes. I have also learned that I am lacking in skills at seeing the broader picture. In meeting with my site mentor, I am always focusing on the implementation level, and not on the leadership level. My site mentor has been great at making my look at the bigger picture. He has suggested to me "to find an area of change, get involved, and then to ride that wave...There will be voids in these areas [of technology], and if you position yourself correctly, you will have some great opportunities to learn and grow." I know I also need to work on my leadership skills. I typically shy away from responsibility and do not like being in charge. I really like being a support person. I will definitely be "pushed" throughout this program. But, I am riding this wave to end. Hopefully I end up on a nice cushy beach and not being slammed into the corral reef by the wave.

Web Conference - EDLD 5306 Wk5

This weeks web conference was moved to Tuesday at 8pm. And I actually had 2 back-to-back conferences that night. The first web conf was from my school and discussed specific social media technologies and how to incorporate them into the classroom. it was very informative and I have already tried using Cover-It-Live.

The EDLD 5306 conference this week was VERY helpful. Ms. Borel showed us how to break down the Internship Plan and the Principal Competencies into manageable pieces. This assignment had 8 areas broken into 33 topics and 78 activities, which makes you cringe just thinking about where to start. But, she gave a document which showed a breakdown of each activity and what page number to look up in the textbook. After that it was fairly easy. We also discussed the 300 hours required in the internship. 150 hours are embedded in the classes and 150 hours are on our own and the activities are laid out in the Internship Plan and Principal Competencies. There was also a document that had a to-do list for upcoming classes and activities. I was also able to share my Wordle activity I did in class with my students finding all the vocabulary words they did not know from the TAKS test. All in all it was very informative and helped me better understand the upcoming assignment.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Web Conference - EDLD 5306 Wk4

I missed last weeks web conference, but I am glad I attended this one. The conference discussed the requirements and benefits of the TK20 system. I have poked around it a little and noticed that it will be a good tool to build and maintain a portfolio of my work throughout Grad School. I am also glad that the professor broke down the Internship documents. Just reading over them, they are quite scary. But after the explanation, they are pretty simple. This must be how my students feel. They must see Algebra for the first time and run away in fear. Hopefully I am there to break it down into small manageable chunks.

I also received information on my wiki site. I asked if I could put all of my Grad School stuff under one link, so that I could start building the site for use at school with my Algebra 1 class. Unfortunately, they have a specific way they want to see the wiki, and suggested that I develop another site for use with Algebra 1 class. I'm not all that thrilled about this, but it probably won't be that hard to make another site.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

E-Rate and Irving ISD

National Education Technology Plan - NETP - Wk 2 Assignment

The National Education Technology Plan (NETP) was developed to achieve the goal of having the U.S., again, leading the world in college graduates.  By leveraging technology and fostering a community of life-long learners, this goal is attainable.  The plan is broken up into five categories: Learning, Assessment, Teaching, Infrastructure and Productivity.

For learning, the NETP expects all students to have a "engaging and empowering learning experiences" (National Education Technology Plan [NETP], 2010).  There should be a core set of standards that form the basis of what should be learn.  And from those standards, students and educators should have the option to design whatever type of engaging instruction needed to accomplish this goal.

For assessment, the NETP expects the education system to develop more authentic and timely ways to measure a student’s success and adjust as needed.  This includes the use of data to drive decisions and continually improve learning.

For teaching, the NETP expects all educators to leverage technology to improve learning and assessment and connect students to 24/7 resources.  The NETP addresses the technology gap between educators and the 21st century professionals, and expects the education system to develop programs to teach educators how to incorporate relevant technology and integrate connected learning environments.

For infrastructure, the NETP expects all students and educators to have access to a robust and diverse set of technology and access to the various networks needed for successful connected learning environments.

For productivity, the NETP expects the education system to redesign the processes and structures, at all levels, to leverage the power of technology to transform the learning environment to meet the needs of a new generation of learners.

The NETP is a very well defined plan to increase the use of technology to improve the overall learning environment for all stakeholders.  One limiting factor that I do not see addressed and is a problem I experience in my own teaching career deals with access in low income populations.  My students all have laptop computers provided by the school and have full access to the internet and outside communities while at school.  But many of my student's families cannot afford broadband internet access at home and this limits the 24/7 connected learning environments these students can be involved in.  I understand that students' home lives may lie outside the purview of the NETP, but until this aspect is addressed, the success of many of the initiatives may be limited.  One solution to this problem has worked in my community.  The school district has partnered with many local businesses to provide free Wi-Fi access to the students.  So, the students may not have broadband at home, but they can visit many businesses around the community to maintain access to their 24/7 connected learning environments.


National Education Technology Plan [NETP], 2010 - Transforming American Education,  Learning Powered by Technology - National Education Technology Plan 2010 - U.S. Department of Education - 

School District Technology Plan - Wk 2 Assignment


The Irving Independent School District (Irving ISD) understands that to ensure their students will be successful in the 21st century, they must be provided a technologically diverse learning environment.  To plan for this learning environment, Irving ISD has developed a Long Range Technology Plan (LRTP) that sets out several goals and encompasses four components: "Teaching and Learning, Professional Development, Administrative and Support Services, and Infrastructure for Technology" (Irving ISD, 2010). 


Under Teaching and Learning, Irving ISD has developed these goals:
  • GOAL 1: Infuse higher level thinking with technology and quality instruction to ensure engaging learning experiences for all teachers and students. 
  • GOAL 2: Support assessment and planning through the use of technology. 
  • GOAL 3: Educate all students and teachers in responsible technology use.



Under Professional Development, Irving ISD has developed this goal:
  • GOAL 4: Ensure educator professional development is on‐going, high quality, based on the National Educational Technology Standards (NETS), and increasing in rigor so that student learning and 21st century skills are increased.


Under Administrative and Support Services, Irving ISD has developed these goals:
  • GOAL 5: Ensure 100% administrative participation in appropriate, current and new software programs. 
  • GOAL 6: Provide leadership to leverage technology for the improvement of teaching and learning in every classroom daily.


And, under Infrastructure for Technology, Irving ISD has developed this goal:
  • GOAL 7: Ensure a stable and robust infrastructure for technology use.


Each of these goals is broken into subsections and lists specific strategies, timelines, stakeholders, and evidence of progress.  It is a very robust and complete plan, with goals attainable in the timelines set.  The plan also includes a breakdown of the budget requirements and specific funding sources needed for each goal.

One of the main aspects of the plan is the Professional Development guidelines listed in Goal 4.  There are 18 sub-categories and a budget of $4.3 million over the three year plan.  Many of the aspects of the plan are continuations of existing staff development programs that include: Levels of Technology Implementation (LoTI) training, professional learning communities through shared environments (i.e. Blackboard, wikis, online tools), and others programs.  The staff development plan does not discuss too many specific software programs or equipment, but rather focuses types of technology and their successful implementation in the class room.  Trainings are available for all stakeholders in the school district, from the classroom teacher to the school administrators and district-level support staff.

Each goal and sub-categories have specific criterion listed for evidence of successful implementation and completion.  Many of these criterions are data driven, like an increase of 10% in the attendance of certain staff developments.  The other criterions are based on visual inspection of the training sessions.  Professional development is the responsibility of Content Coordinators, the Director of Staff Development, the Director of Instructional Technology and the Technology Coordinators.

Irving ISD has researched and developed a contingency plan if the "E-rate" program is discontinued. (Goal 7, Strategy 7.2.9, Irving ISD, 2010).  They have developed the plan to monitor the progress of the LRTP by utilizing usage data and STaR Charts from the Texas Education Agency.



Irving ISD, 2010 - Long Range Technology Plan 2010-2013 - http://www.irvingisd.net/technology/documents/lrtp.pdf

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Wk 2 Web Conference - Lamar Univ EDLD 5306

We just completed the 2nd web conference for my first Grad class.  There were a bunch of good questions asked and the Professor gave a lot of great information on the upcoming assignments and the structure of the entire program.  The degree is a series of 5-wk classes and completes in 18 months.  Along with the very quick classes, we are also going to be doing an Internship over those 18 months.  OVERWHELMED does not fully describe what I am feeling now.  Luckily I have the support of a loving family and I am truly interested in the degree program.

Technology Assessments - Wk 2 Assignment

Technology Assessments - Wk 2 Assignment

In the world of Education, we are always trying new ways of reaching the students and preparing them for the world they will enter when they leave us.  As most people understand, education has recognized the need to integrate all forms of technology into the classroom and to teach our students to be successful "digital citizens."

Unfortunately education is often way behind the curve when it comes to technology.  So we are trying to scramble and get up to date on many things.  But, we don't have an open checkbook to buy every new technology that hits the market.  There are strings attached to all the expenditures, for good reasons.  One of the strings is that the educators and students are assessed on how technologically literate we are.  This makes sense, right?  What is the point of buying new equipment if the teacher won't know how to turn it on?  You don't give a monkey an iPhone and expect great results.  In Texas, we use STaR Charts for assessing teachers.  According to the Texas Education Agency, the Texas School Technology and Readiness (STaR) Chart is "an online resource tool for self-assessment of your campus’ and district’s efforts to effectively integrate technology across the curriculum. This rubric serves as the standard for assessing technology preparedness in Texas K-12 schools" (Texas Education Agency [TEA], 2006).  In this assessment, teachers rate themselves and their campus' on a scale of 1-4, 1 representing the lowest rating of Early Tech and 4 representing the highest rating of Target Tech.

I feel that assessing the teachers is a valuable tool to determine the effectiveness and readiness of the teachers with regards to their technology prowess.  However, I think the system Texas uses is slightly flawed.  Since the teacher rate themselves, I don't think we get a completely accurate rating.  I say this, because I feel that most teachers are intimidated by technology and often underrate their own abilities.  I have seen many examples of teachers that swear they don't know how to use technology, but will then successfully lead a class using several pieces of equipment and software without a single hiccup.  In their mind they rate themselves low, but in actuality their skills far exceed their perceptions.  I also feel that, since many people are intimidated by technology, they have not figured out that many "NEW" things are actually just re-badged versions of old stuff.  We are rolling out Google Docs at school and many people are just fascinated with the name.....GOOOOOOOOGGGLLLEEEE  DOOOOOCCCCSSS......(*can't you just hear that in full Dolby Digital Surround Sound at the movie theater*).  When I explain to them that it is just an online version of Microsoft Office Products with some new, albeit amazing, features, they say "oh, well that doesn't sound too hard."  So, a subjective assessment based on a person's view of their technological abilities may not be the best method.  However, I do not know a better method.  As we improve the teachers abilities, and they become better at truly rating their skills, this assessment will move closer to being a true reading of the teachers and campus.  Until then, I think it may be the best method we have.

Texas Education Agency [TEA], 2006 - Texas Campus STaR Chart -  http://starchart.epsilen.com/docs/TxCSC.pdf

Muted Mic Icon


Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Wk 1 Web Conference - Lamar Univ EDLD 5306

We had our first web conference last week on 8-23-2011.  It was interesting to say the least.  Watching the webcams of the other participants was fun and finding out that we have a big mix of classmates from Teachers to Firemen, and from locations in Texas to India.


The web conference, or webinar as my wife called it, started off a little shaky.  We had to figure out the basics of operating our mic's and headphones.  Once everybody learned to shut off their mic when they aren't talking, things went much better.  I did notice that the people using headsets were much easier to hear.  Unfortunately this made us look like telemarketers.


All in all it was a good time and I look forward to the next one.

Intro

I am Mr. Waits.  I teach currently teach Algebra 1 in the DFW, TX area.  I am also enrolled in Grad School through Lamar Univ.  Many of my assignments will require blog posts, and this will be the place for them.  This blog may eventually transition into something else.  I guess we will see.